National Socialists for Israel
Controversies don't last long. They appear in a blur of media attention, flicker across our collective consciousness, and vanish into a cloud of items similarly demanding attention. Our society, motivated by the need of individuals to make news and promote themselves, and of news agencies to keep something that appears controversial but is innocuous in the news, retains nothing more than two weeks.
One controversy that should have stayed newsworthy was the bemused irritation at "National Socialists for Israel," a German group who endorsed Israel, made pro-Jewish statements, and yet claimed to be National Socialism (Nazism) in a pure form. Most of the public scratched their heads at this seeming paradox and forgot it an hour later. But was it a paradox at all?
Let's look at their statements first.
"Israel also has a right to exist," their website announces, and heaps praise on the military independence of the Jewish people over the last 2,000 years. "It is our duty as neo-Nazis to defend this supreme success," it continues, lambasting anti-Semitic nationalists as "politicos, cowards, and reactionaries."
The most controversial statement however is this one, translated by Norman Finkelstein: "We must view what is referred to as 'the Holocaust' within the context of acts of self-defense undertaken by nations under threat." However, they added, "there is no justification for it," and suggested that the Nazis should have supported the Zionist cause instead.
We at the LNSG agree with this position as part of our longstanding belief that nationalism is the correct form of government for all ethnicities, and that by mutually supporting this right, we will free each other from the dominance of nation-states that destroy traditional cultures and replace them with commerce, popularity contest media, and a quest for individualism that leaves people hollow and spiritless.
As stated in Hitler and Anti-Semitism, we believe that the NSDAP's mania for destroying the Jewish population arose from a mis-interpretation of their own beliefs. For Europeans, Jewish-style materialistic philosophy is the exact opposite of the kind of transcendental idealism that has characterized European belief systems for as far into the past as history can see.
The most important unmentioned concept here however is context. In the context of Germany, Judaic thought is out of place. In the context of Israel, Germanic thought is. Each culture needs its own space, and its own beliefs, and to mix them is to cause what people now call "racism" and "anti-Semitism." Multiculturalism, a form of pluralism, creates the antagonisms we know as prejudice.
Theodor Herzl, the famous Zionist, knew this. He wrote:
"The Jewish question persists wherever Jews live in appreciable numbers. Wherever it does not exist, it is brought in together with Jewish immigrants. We are naturally drawn into those places where we are not persecuted, and our appearance there gives rise to persecution. This is the case, and will inevitably be so, everywhere, even in highly civilised countries—see, for instance, France—so long as the Jewish question is not solved on the political level. The unfortunate Jews are now carrying the seeds of anti-Semitism into England; they have already introduced it into America."
His point was that since each nation has a nationality, introduction of a "nationless" group, for example Jews, will cause resentment and bring about the kind of prejudice that has marked anti-Jewish activity in every host nation they have had. Herzl saw the situation as a relatively blameless one; Jews were wandering in the diaspora, looking for a place to live, but because the inhabitants of those places wanted to preserve their own national culture, they fought back with bigotry.
"National Socialists for Israel" seem to know this as well. They recognize, as does the LNSG, that the Holocaust was the result of a misunderstanding which enabled sentiment against Jewish ideas and Jewish presence in Germany to be carried too far into an attack on its physical manifestation, which would be Jews themselves. It is enough for us to say that each nation needs to be composed of its own traditional ethnicity, with its traditional culture and language and values intact.
As sensible people, we know that to extend this to one group and not another will engender resentment, and unless we want to commit literal xenocide, there is no point in such antagonism. Conversely, extending this right to others -- a process called Pan-Nationalism -- means that we call all enjoy our native cultures and not suffer the cultureless, cosmopolitan grey race that mercantile nation-states create.
Even more, this warning is timely. Israel struggles with the question of Palestinians, its Arab underclass, who both work jobs Israelis want to outsource and support policies subverting the Jewish-only state of Israel. Palestinians are comparable to Roma/Sinti in Europe, Mexicans and African-Americans in the USA, and Saami in Nordic countries: an extragenetic population with some recent claim to the land, but of different abilities and inclinations than the host population which now dominates it. These situations produce virulent racism and an ugly, passive-aggressive counterreaction.
We call these "discrimination situations," and they have attributes in common:
The population in question has a contested name, and pick a new one.
Constant accusations of casual discrimination and bigoted commentary.
They have high rates of suicide, alcoholism, unemployment, crime.
They form their own contra-national party and identity.
They always need welfare and legal help from their host nation.
At the stage where discrimination situations have arisen, the situation will only worsen until the national principle is restored: one people -- ethnically, culturally, linguistically and in values systems -- per nation. The idea of the "nation-state," or that we can bond people together with political and economic principles alone, is inherently deconstructive and as a result fails to capture the context of its interactions over time. Nation-states create racism. Nationalism cures it.
For this reason, as well as simple decency, all National Socialists and neo-Nazis should support Israel and the return of Israel to a national socialist state. National Socialism (Nazism) represents the principle by which all ancient nations were constructed, which is fierce nationalism with a state that defends its people against excessive commerce while maintaining competition. Israel is both our past and a future inspiration, and with brotherhood we can both achieve our aims in transcending the nation-state.
לקוח מתוך:
http://www.nazi.org/community/columns/martinez/