"then tell me what regime you are talking about exactly?"
The current one. The one what is damn busy with Interventionism. Which is my main problem with it.
"the only countries that been using chemical and biological weapons since WW2 was muslim countries"
And you are calling me a hypocrite. The most rescent examples of chemical weapons usage by non-muslim nations include the usage of W.P. for non screening purposes by the USMC in Falujah and by the IDF in Lebanon. There are videos appearing and disappearing almost daily on YouTube showing W.P. being fired from air in Falujah for example.
"4.there is no such thing as "palestinian" and never were"
This is something I can accept. Even though that does not justifies
the ethnic cleansing of the lands. Palestinian or not.
"what the fact that israeli airplane was carrying biological and\or chemical"
That is the proof what Israel is making Sarin. That was my point and it is backed by facts, obviously.
"8.killing civilians on both side?
they are no civilians each one of them is armed someway even if its not a weapon it can be a rock or a molotov!"
That is not true, and you know it. So far your arguments where pretty reasonable, but this one is over the top.
"please don't start with me about hezbollah they are a terrorist guerrila organizations who fire rockets from civilian houses on civilians of israel and killing jews around the world!"
I did not intend to justify the killing of Jews. I think I already stated clearly what I do not support terrorism in any form.
".another reason iran do not deserves nuclear weapons is because they support terrorists they arm Hamas and hezbollah which is definetly illegal!"
Lets see... Iran did not used its Chemical weapons even when it was justified by the Chemical convention of that time during the Iraq/Iran war. Iraq gassed the shit out of Iran, yet they did not retaliate with Chemicals... Israel on the other hand tends to shower White P even if attacked with conventional weapons.
The question is, who is more inclined to use Chems? Boy, Thats a hard one, eh?
"israel never supported no terror group"
What about JDL? And don't tell me Israel does not support them, even if secretly.
Again, I condemn and dislike all terror groups. Black, white, jew, muslim. All are pathetic.
"you are no anti semite you are just ignorat.
no problem to fix that!"
This made me smile. Why thank you for trying to...enlighten me.
Anyway, I've written this in a hurry. So if I left something unanswered please tell me.
P.S.
I've actually enjoy this talk. Much more interesting than debating with Nazi's or Liberals... (more)
a.) Interventionism- makes me wonder, what would you call "Jihad"? (how about calling the Israeli campaign an atempt for self defence. although it is, in reality, pretty pathetic )
There is a call that walks this earth, and the call is loud, malevolent, perennial and cogent.
That call is: "La Ila Ella Allah U'Muhamad Rassul Allah"- wich means: There is no one obove Allah and Muhamad his mesenger.
There is World war 3 going on in the world since 1979 and you are talking about "Interventionism"??? WAKE UP AND SMELL THE ROSES MAN!!!
b.) You are using W.P. as an example for use of chemical weopons? Don't make me laugh.
I am talking about REAL chemical weopons such as: Cyanide, VX, Sarin, Soman, Tabun, Musturd Gas and so on.
The only ones to use such weopons since WW2 were only muslims, Sorry my friend but history is on my side in this debate.
c.) ethnic? cleansing? whom are you trying to fool? how many muslims were killed by Israel? not even 5000 so do me a favor and don't repeat that absolute NONSENS.
d.) The fact that Israel is creating WMD's (Chemical Biological or Nuclear for that matter) is no hard evedence what so ever for any use of such weopons in reality!!!
e.) JDL was never sopported by any means by Israel, you have no hard evedence to counter that so please don't speculate baseless accusations.
כל שאר התגובה שלו היא הבל גמור שלא ראויה לתגובה כלל, הוא לא הביא כל הוכחה רצינית לאף אחת מטענותיו.